What's happening?

Video Sources 23 Views Report Error

  • Watch trailer
  • Server 12ru
Lincoln 2012 123movies

Lincoln 2012 123movies

With the moral courage and fierce determination to succeed, his choices will change the fate of generations to come.Nov. 09, 2012149 Min.
Your rating: 0
8 1 vote

Synopsis

#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – In 1865, as the American Civil War winds inexorably toward conclusion, U.S. president Abraham Lincoln endeavors to achieve passage of the landmark constitutional amendment which will forever ban slavery from the United States. However, his task is a race against time, for peace may come at any time, and if it comes before the amendment is passed, the returning southern states will stop it before it can become law. Lincoln must, by almost any means possible, obtain enough votes from a recalcitrant Congress before peace arrives and it is too late. Yet the president is torn, as an early peace would save thousands of lives. As the nation confronts its conscience over the freedom of its entire population, Lincoln faces his own crisis of conscience — end slavery or end the war.
Plot: The revealing story of the 16th US President’s tumultuous final months in office. In a nation divided by war and the strong winds of change, Lincoln pursues a course of action designed to end the war, unite the country and abolish slavery. With the moral courage and fierce determination to succeed, his choices during this critical moment will change the fate of generations to come.
Smart Tags: #based_on_real_person #1860s #american_civil_war #politics #cultural_conflict #based_on_true_story #american_history #senate #senator #ulysses_s._grant_character #the_white_house #abraham_lincoln_character #mary_todd_lincoln_character #robert_e._lee_character #character_name_as_title #19th_century #politician #american_president #u.s._president #husband_wife_relationship #father_son_relationship


Lincoln 2012 Streaming Links:


Ratings:

Lincoln 2012 123movies 1 Lincoln 2012 123movies 27.3/10 Votes: 252,421
Lincoln 2012 123movies 3 Lincoln 2012 123movies 289%
Lincoln 2012 123movies 5 Lincoln 2012 123movies 286/100
Lincoln 2012 123movies 7 Lincoln 2012 123movies 26.9 Votes: 3042 Popularity: 10.816

Reviews:

This is a flat out great movie. I first watched it several years ago and enjoyed it, so recently I noticed it on the IMDB streaming service and decided to watch it again. I still think it is great. I guess I had forgotten that it was a Spielberg film, so why wouldn’t it be great? It was many years in the making and was partially based on Doris Goodwin Kearns excellent non-fiction book Team of Rivals.

The cast is excellent: Daniel Day-Lewis is really impressive as President Lincoln. Lincoln is believable, human, showing several sides of his personality. He is at times funny, wise, empathetic, coarse, tortured and — well, everything I would expect after reading so much about him over the years.

For me, the movie lost a little of its energy when it shifted to the political maneuvers undertaken concerning the obtaining of votes to pass the amendment Lincoln wants to push through Congress, but it is integral to the plot, illustrating that Lincoln was pragmatic and willing to play the game to achieve his goals. Because he narrowed the scope of this Lincoln biopic to the last months of the great president’s life, Spielberg was able to cover a lot of ground, and explore the issue of slavery and the war from numerous perspectives.

I do regret watching it through that streaming service. I don’t mind ads, but they popped in randomly, sometimes twenty minutes apart, once five minutes apart, and always right in the middle of scenes. I plan to watch it again, with no commercials. I suggest you do the same.

Review By: Peter McGinn Rating: 9 Date: 2020-11-13
It lacked a big deal of rhythm but the revision of the history and, specially, the great performance by Day-Lewis makes it a movie worth watching.
Review By: Andres Gomez Rating: 7 Date: 2015-02-13
Abraham Lincoln deserved a better film
‘Lincoln’ is one of the bigger favorites for Oscar Awards this year and will certainly be one of the heroes of the evening in Hollywood a few weeks from now. It is made by one of the greatest directors of our time, it tells a big American story and features a big American hero, it enjoys some fine acting and is very accurate in searching into history and retrieving a moment and a story that continues to impact the American social and political fabric until today. And yet, ‘Lincoln’ did not turn to me into a cinema experience to enjoy. Actually something interesting happens with my relation with Steven Spielberg. The film I liked most is one of his first – the very little known Duel, a minimalistic masterpiece, followed by the wonderful Close Encounters and E.T. I enjoyed the Indiana Jones and The Jurassic Park series for what they are meant to be – great entertainment. However my personal experience with his ‘serious stuff’ is mixed. While Saving Private Ryan is for me the best war film ever made, and Schindler’s List is one of the best in the Holocaust genre, other stuff looks sometimes pretentious, sometimes too naive. As much as he tries to prove, Spielberg cannot do films about any subject, I mean he certainly can, but not all are that good.

Most of the action in ‘Lincoln’ takes place during the month of January of 1865. After four years of Civil War victory is quite close for the North, but the ending would have been meaningful only if the 13th Amendment making slavery illegal was adopted, making the reason of going to war and the temporary judicial war decisions part of the Constitution. Timing is critical, as the nation is tired and aspires for peace and recovery, and without the adoption of the amendment the end of the war may mean a compromise that leaves slavery in place. Abraham Lincoln will make all possible political maneuvering in order to have the amendment pass, in a Congress where he did not have the required majority. There is an interesting dilemma here about using ‘unclean’ political means in order to achieve a just cause and this is one of the principal themes. There are two problems here however in my opinion. One is that the political intrigues occupy a good half if not more of the film, and what we get on the screen is a painfully long succession of bearded gentlemen under top hats arguing and bribing for the good cause. I guess some of the American audiences are more familiar with the historical characters, but even so this is a long and repetitive succession of more of the same, and even the climax scene of the voting in the House misses some of the thrill I have expected. The other problem is the political speak which is attributed to almost all characters in the film. Maybe the script writers used fragments from speeches, I do not know, but there is too much rhetoric, too many historical sentences are being said by many characters (not only by Lincoln) and even in what should have been day-to-day situations. The overall result seemed to me tiring and emphatic. It is actually the non-political secondary threads that seemed more interesting – for example the agonizing decision of the parents Lincoln not allowing their elder son to fight in the war. This dilemma would have deserved a film by itself, a smaller but maybe better one.

Much was said and written (even a cover story in TIME Magazine) about Daniel Day-Lewis’s impersonation of Lincoln. He is good but far in my opinion from his own creation in ‘My Left Foot’ or from Joaquin Phoenix’s act in ‘The Master’ (best acting of the year in my view). The way he is filmed does not help, too many frames are looking towards catching his silhouette or making his profile look like the pictures which represent Lincoln in his time. Again, when he is human, when his words are not taken from speeches he looks and sounds better, but this is only for part of the time. Rhetoric prevailed in the building of this role, and Spielberg’s scope looks like creating as many scenes to quote, but less to link them in a fluent story as he knows to do that well. I liked much more the supporting roles of Sally Field as a Lincoln’s wife, or maybe the wife of all presidents or great men who sacrifice their personal lives for the greater causes, and of Tommy Lee Jones as the radical pro-abolitionist politician Thaddeus Stevens, a man whose life was dedicated to the fight against slavery, but who knows to make the right political move at the critical moment to achieve the legal confirmation of the dream, at a tough personal price with respect to his own ideals. In a movie where so many characters including the one that gives the name of the film are no more than rhetoric symbols, these two living heroes played by the two great actors make a refreshing difference.

Review By: dromasca Rating: 6 Date: 2013-02-03
Should be Titled “13”
So what happened?

1. The first problem with this film is the script. The writer Tony Kushner is a Pulitzer winning theater writer, but other than “Munich” he hasn’t done any motion pictures. The long drawn out dialogue between Lincoln’s cabinet and the lengthy parliamentary congress sessions might play well on Broadway, but they linger on screen. It wasn’t just Kushner’s fault. Spielberg is one of the few directors who has final cut on anything he does, so ultimately it’s yet another vast mis-judgment by the best known director and one of the wealthiest filmmakers in the world. He’s currently slated to direct Indiana Jones 5, so I guess that tells you where his judgment is. We’re all waiting patiently for him to retire with some dignity, but he’s just Brett Favre’n it all the way.

It was a huge mistake for Dreamworks when deciding on the story, not to include Lincoln’s childhood, his struggle with schooling, the severe poverty he faced growing up on the western frontier, and how he had to teach himself how to be a lawyer, family roots, his political career, and ultimately, his assassination. It’s very clear from the beginning, that this film is not about Lincoln’s life, but a very specific part of his presidency,(The Emancipation Proclamation).

90 minutes of this 150 minute film was spent on the 13th Amendment. So much so, that every single member of congress when voting, had their own screen time to voice that vote. It should have been called, “Emancipation” or “ep13”, but not “Lincoln.” Do not go into this movie expecting to learn about Abraham Lincoln’s life. You will be hugely disappointed.

2. There was no sense of space. No aerial shots of Washington DC in the 1860s… no city shots showing how life was back then… just interior scenes, a few battlefield scenes, and a few outdoor speeches. And this coming from one of the greatest special effects pioneers of the medium- lame.

3. No secret service. The Secret Service was created by President Lincoln on April 14, 1865, the day of his assassination. Don’t you think that would be an interesting thing to showcase in a movie titled “Lincoln?” One third of the US currency in circulation was counterfeit at the time. There was no mention of it. And also, at no point did you see ANY security around the president except for a few soldiers around him in wide shots. It just made it seem even more like a filmmaker trying to tell his own pretentious tale of history instead of what really happened.

4. To much cabinet delegation and congress discussion; not enough “Lincoln.” Sure, the film made an attempt to show his affection for his son Todd, and you did see some private moments with his wife Mary, but it was all put there in a disingenuous way because the story wasn’t about his family. It was hammering the 13th Amendment down our throats the whole film. Did the NAACP make this film? Lol.

5. The cast was too big. There’s over 120 speaking roles in this film. 120! That’s insane. Daniel Day Lewis was dazzling- his eyes just penetrated you, as usual. He projected the essence of Lincoln (at least from what legend suggests) through an indirect manner that can only be witnessed to understand. He will get the Oscar nomination for this, no question. My prediction- he will win the best actor Academy Award. Everyone else was very good, a few were great- Holbrook and Stratharin especially. Sally Field was good, but not great- and Tommy Lee was his old self- always brilliant, but never stretching beyond his usual.

6. The ending. Instead of showing the horror of what happened the night of April 14, 1865, Spielberg decided to leave out the Ford Theater altogether and instead show another theater during another play, in which a man comes on stage and makes an announcement that Lincoln was shot. Then Lincoln’s youngest son Todd, who happens to be attending this “other” play, looses it. And that’s it. Not only do you have to sit through 2.5 hours of boring film, but there is no pay off at the end (because we KNEW this ending was coming). To show it like they did was almost as tragic as the event itself. I’m not saying show the bullet rip through his skull, but show us the event as it unfolded- don’t deny the audience of that emotion.

I understand not wanting to glorify Booth. I get that. But this is history now. It happened almost 150 years ago. And Spielberg didn’t think twice to show civil war soldiers being brutally murdered in the beginning of the film, why not show the murder at the end and DE-mystify it for all of us? And if his argument is that this film isn’t about that, then why even show that part of his presidency at all??? Why not end the film with Lincoln still living… insinuating that his efforts and spirit still live on? This Jewish filmmaker can make a film about Oscar Schindler and show atrocities of monumental proportion… he can make a film called Saving Private Ryan and re define brutality, but he can’t show the death of our most beloved President from Lincoln’s perspective? – there may not have even been a holocaust if Lincoln had survived. So Steven, please don’t give me the “we can’t show that” line because you showed it a hundred times in Schindler’s list and you won an Oscar for it.

It saddens me a great deal to write this review. I never would have dreamed that I would be giving Steven Spielberg’s “Lincoln” a 2 out of 10. My advice: Watch this film for a clinic on acting and cinematography- but wait for it on video. I might buy the DVD as a cure for insomnia.

Review By: frezeframe Rating: 2 Date: 2012-11-21

Other Information:

Original Title Lincoln
Release Date 2012-11-09
Release Year 2012

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 30 min (150 min)
Budget 65000000
Revenue 275293450
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Biography, Drama, History
Director Steven Spielberg
Writer Tony Kushner, Doris Kearns Goodwin
Actors Daniel Day-Lewis, Sally Field, David Strathairn
Country United States, India
Awards Won 2 Oscars. 108 wins & 252 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Digital, Datasat, SDDS, Dolby Surround 7.1, Dolby Atmos
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2, Panavision Primo and Super Speed Z-Series MKII Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Platinum, Panavision Primo and Super Speed Z-Series MKII Lenses
Laboratory DeLuxe, Hollywood (CA), USA, Technicolor, Hollywood (CA), USA (digital intermediate), Technicolor, New York (NY), USA (dailies)
Film Length 4,104 m (8 reels), 4,119 m (Portugal, 35 mm)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision3 250D 5207, Vision3 500T 5219)
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format), Super 35 (3-perf) (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (anamorphic) (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema

Lincoln 2012 123movies
Lincoln 2012 123movies
Lincoln 2012 123movies
Lincoln 2012 123movies
Lincoln 2012 123movies
Original title Lincoln
TMDb Rating 6.9 3,042 votes

Similar titles

Witness for the Prosecution 1957 123movies
The Doors 1991 123movies
Blue Jasmine 2013 123movies
The Cable Guy 1996 123movies
Mary Queen of Scots 2018 123movies
Mercury Rising 1998 123movies
American Honey 2016 123movies
Dead Man’s Shoes 2004 123movies
Meet Joe Black 1998 123movies
The Poseidon Adventure 1972 123movies
Elephant 2003 123movies
Bitter Moon 1992 123movies
123movies.co.nz