What's happening?

Video Sources 12 Views Report Error

  • Watch traileryoutube.com
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
  • Source 4123movies
  • Source 5123movies
Mank 2020 123movies

Mank 2020 123movies

Nov. 13, 2020133 Min.
Your rating: 0
8 1 vote


#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – 1930’s Hollywood is reevaluated through the eyes of scathing social critic and alcoholic screenwriter Herman J. Mankiewicz as he races to finish the screenplay of Citizen Kane (1941).
Plot: 1930s Hollywood is reevaluated through the eyes of scathing social critic and alcoholic screenwriter Herman J. Mankiewicz as he races to finish the screenplay of Citizen Kane.
Smart Tags: #1930s #1940s #screenwriter #alcoholic #los_angeles_california #reference_to_battle_of_hastings #reference_to_william_shakespeare #reference_to_thomas_jefferson #funeral #hollywood_california #reference_to_herman_mankiewicz #politics #writer #writing #birthday #party #filmmaking #beach #jew #jewish #election

Mank 2020 Streaming Links:


Mank 2020 123movies 1 Mank 2020 123movies 27.0/10 Votes: 43,975
Mank 2020 123movies 3 Mank 2020 123movies 2N/A
Mank 2020 123movies 5 Mank 2020 123movies 279/100
Mank 2020 123movies 7 Mank 2020 123movies 27 Votes: 696 Popularity: 32.025


If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog @

This last week of mine has been one of the most challenging I’ve ever had since I started this project. Not only due to the number of David Fincher’s films (Se7en, Fight Club, Zodiac, The Social Network, Gone Girl) I (re)watched in preparation for Mank (plus Citizen Kane), but also because these aren’t exactly movies I usually review this quick. Since Zodiac was the only first-watch of this bunch, I was able to surprise myself and fly through the writing process, actually managing to deliver each article daily as I idealized. Finally, the time for one of Netflix’s biggest baits for the upcoming awards season had arrived, so I watched Fincher’s latest yesterday night.

Clearly, I’m a fan of Fincher’s style, as my opinions about his filmography prove, so I always expect one of the best films of the respective year to come out of his work. However, having in mind the biographical premise, I know that this type of movie heavily relies on its storytelling. In my case, if a film like this isn’t able to offer me new relevant information about a subject I already possess some knowledge of, then inevitably I’ll end up disappointed. Even if I still receive these new story details, the transmission must be performed in a compelling manner, which usually these movies fail to do, basing their scripts too much on lazy exposition. So, I tried to keep my expectations moderately high yet realistic and hopeful.

Before I share my thoughts, a quick disclaimer. Mank will undoubtedly generate quite a divisive response from the general public. Why? From something as simple as the fact that the film is on black-and-white to the crime that is people not knowing a single thing about Citizen Kane (including never seeing it) but still choosing to watch Mank, there will be countless examples of viewers who will watch the latter with terribly unrealistic expectations. Audiences all around the world will find this movie “boring, uneventful”, and say stuff like, “I fell asleep five minutes in”, “another artsy B&W uninteresting film for critics to blindly love”. Some of these comments will unavoidably come from people who just sat on their couch and clicked a random flick that they saw on Netflix.

The marketing campaign could never place a pre-requirement to watch Mank, but I can, and I will. As straightforward and honest as I possibly can: if you’ve never watched Citizen Kane in your life, then either you do it before even opening your streaming service, or please, skip Mank because you’ll probably not enjoy it at all. I firmly believe only 1/1000 viewers will like the latter if they have zero knowledge about Orson Welles’ iconic movie. Ideally, (re)watch it, and research a bit about its background: what lead to the creation of the film, who was involved, what controversies surrounded the movie… I know what you’re thinking: isn’t that what Mank is supposed to tell me about? This takes me to one of my issues with the film.

There are basically two options in this genre: either the director and/or the screenwriter choose to help the audience follow the story by introducing them to what they will witness, or they jump straight into the narrative itself. Fincher doesn’t waste a second helping the audience understand what’s happening or, in some cases, who even are the characters. Either the viewers know what they’re getting themselves into (like I advise above) or prepare yourself for an incredibly intricate narrative, wholly packed with flashbacks, side stories, and many, many characters.

This will be a significant reason why some people will definitely dislike this movie. I researched and studied Citizen Kane to exhaustion, and I still felt lost during some periods due to the overwhelming amount of subplots and its characters. Then, even though the following is connected to one of the aspects I love the most about Mank, there are at least a couple of other characters besides Herman J. Mankiewicz who I wish I could have learned more about, mainly Marion Davies (Amanda Seyfried) and Joseph L. Mankiewicz (Tom Pelphrey), the protagonist’s brother. On the other hand, this also means that despite the high number of characters, most are indeed quite interesting, possessing emotionally compelling arcs.

I just noticed I started my review stating my issues with the film, but don’t be mistaken: I really, really like it. However, since I’m already here, I might as well let out my remaining problem. So, this isn’t close to anything Fincher has done before. It genuinely feels like a remarkably personal project that he surely would have loved to share with his late father, Mank’s posthumously screenwriter, Jack Fincher (I’ll refer to him as Jack from now on, keeping Fincher related to David). If there’s one thing I expected from this movie was Fincher paying homage to Citizen Kane through the technical aspects, including the narrative structure profoundly based on flashbacks to justify a particular opinion, conversation, or event happening in the present.

Evidently, Mank follows the exact same storytelling method as Citizen Kane, and despite it being a brilliant decision from David and/or Jack Fincher, the former lets it take over the story instead of elevating it. The flashbacks are mostly earned and well-placed in the narrative, but sometimes it comes across as a mere technical feature exclusively to make that comparison with Citizen Kane, instead of its execution improving the story both Fincher want to tell. Nevertheless, these issues of mine are far from ruining the entire viewing, much on the contrary.

When it comes to my number one requirement, Fincher nails it perfectly. I loved getting to know the real-life inspirations that led Mankiewicz to create one of the greatest screenplays of all-time, as well as the shocking (and unknown to me) conditions he had to work on. It’s truly a filmmaking miracle to be able to write a masterpiece in the space of two months, being physically and mentally debilitated. Despite the imperfect efficiency of the flashbacks, most develop impactful characters in Mankiewicz’s life, and I can’t deny that it’s a joy for any film lover to see or even hear the mention of some famous filmmakers from that time. Nevertheless, a character is only as great as the actor who portrays it (and vice-versa).

Gary Oldman is undoubtedly a contender for this year’s Best Actor awards. It would be a major snub for him not to be exhaustingly nominated on every single ceremony. I believe his performance in Darkest Hour as Winston Churchill is more visibly riveting (I’ve never been so captivated during a war drama before), but his phenomenal display in Mank is hard to deny. From his hilarious yet grounded portrayal of a drunk Mankiewicz to his more sober, sincere attitude, Oldman demonstrates mind-blowing variation, with his physical performance having a notable influence on the overall result. There’s no doubt that he carries the entire narrative on his shoulders, and he does it effortlessly.

However, Oldman is far from being the only bright spot. Amanda Seyfried can very well get her first serious awards season as the extremely captivating Marion Davies. Seyfried manages to deliver an exquisite balance between the purposefully exaggerated voice mannerisms and Marion’s real personality. Tom Pelphrey is also extraordinary as Mankiewicz’s brother, whom I immediately researched about as soon as I finished the movie. The intensity with which Pelphrey expresses some sentences is becoming one of his trademark characteristics.

I’ve seen many people talking about these two actors, but Lily Collins (Rita Alexander) portrays my favorite character besides the protagonist. As Mankiewicz’s secretary, Lily explores her character in such a heartfelt, authentic manner that, at times, I wished to go back to the present not because of learning more about Citizen Kane’s screenplay actually being written, but due to Rita Alexander’s interactions with her “boss”. Their conversations are some of the most satisfying moments of the entire film, and I genuinely cared for both of them.

I know that most of my readers probably don’t care about technicalities, but if you’ve been following me for enough time, you know I value the technical aspects when they significantly impact the movie. Well, I dare state that a massive reason why I enjoy Mank so much is the near-perfect technical homage that Fincher pays to Orson Welles’ precedent-setting film. From tiny little details like a “cigarette burn” here and there (I counted eight, and if you don’t know what this means, then you clearly didn’t watch Citizen Kane) to similar shot composition, Fincher creates flawless resemblances to the “greatest movie of all-time” in almost every scene, including his own version of a “Rosebud” moment.

This obviously means that Erik Messerschmidt’s cinematography is absolutely stunning. Erik previously worked with Fincher on Mindhunter, proving now that his film career still has a lot of ground to cover. Kirk Baxter could very well be nominated for Best Film Editing, and I can easily picture the exact scene the ceremony would show to demonstrate the seamless, clean cuts which make dialogues easier to follow. Donald Graham Burt, who has worked with Fincher since Zodiac, offers an exceptional production design, but it’s Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross’ score that steals the show for me. Using only period-authentic instruments, Reznor and Ross deliver a rich, unique, memorable tribute to Bernard Herrmann’s work.

All in all, Netflix releases another massive contender for the awards season, Mank. With the perfectionist, dedicated David Fincher at the helm, his late father’s screenplay ends up being Fincher’s most personal project so far. It’s a wonderful homage not only to Citizen Kane but also to the 30s/40s decades. Technically, every single component is award-worthy: cinematography, editing, production design, and especially the score. Fincher works with his team to deliver impressively similar iconic scenes and precedent-setting technical characteristics from Orson Welles’ impactful movie. Outstanding performances across the board, but expect nominations flying the way of Gary Oldman, Amanda Seyfried, and Lily Collins. However, Fincher’s identical narrative structure to the 1941’s flick sometimes feels just like a clever tribute instead of actually elevating the story. Jack Fincher’s screenplay is overwhelmingly crowded with side stories and characters, making it challenging to follow comprehensibly, especially for viewers without any knowledge about the respective matter. Fortunately, the primary mission of representing Herman J. Mankiewicz’s real-life inspirations that led to arguably one of the best screenplays ever written is flawlessly accomplished, making Mank a must-see for any film lover, as long as the viewer has at least watched the so-called “greatest movie of all-time”.

Rating: A-

Review By: msbreviews Rating: 8 Date: 2020-11-29
A fascinating look about what supposedly went into ‘Citizen Kane’.

‘Mank’, a biopic about screenwriter Herman J. Mankiewicz, is a very good watch. A lot goes on and it’s pretty much all interesting to see, admittedly you’d need to have seen the 1941 film. I like that they done this in a non-linear format and in black-and-white, à la in ’41.

Kudos to the cast. Gary Oldman (Herman) is impressive, I did feel he was overacting – likewise with Amanda Seyfried (Marion) – just a little bit in parts but for the vast, vast majority he (and she) is top notch. Arliss Howard (Mayer), Lily Collins (Rita) and a few others are also pleasing to watch.

Review By: r96sk Rating: 8 Date: 2021-02-26
This seems cruel..
But the biggest problem is the writing by the director’s late father, Jack Fincher. David Fincher is a fascinating director and this is an exquisite piece of filmmaking and almost assuredly this year’s Oscar winner for production design, but it’s incoherent sometimes even for those who are familiar with the characters. The acting is fine by the entire cast, but no one thrilled or moved me. The cinematography is also a highlight as is the score, but ultimately a director I greatly admire has his biggest misfire. I do think that this might be one film that benefited from the pandemic. It’s very hard to believe that this would have been a success at the box office. Technically it’s a major achievement, but that’s about it.

Much to my great surprise for a Fincher film, most of this is boring.

Review By: grygotis Rating: 5 Date: 2021-02-16
Extremely boring
Full disclosure I haven’t finished watching this yet, because I started about a month ago and have gone back a few times. But I’m still only about 30 minutes in because it seems like 3 hours I’m so board. It is so draggy, I usually love Hollywood stories especially set in this period, I was excited. But it’s so slow moving that I don’t quite understand 1.How so many people think it’s great and how it earned so many award nominations and 2. Why did they bother? I’m not sure I want to bother finishing it.
Review By: lbowdls Rating: 3 Date: 2021-02-12

Other Information:

Original Title Mank
Release Date 2020-11-13
Release Year 2020

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 11 min (131 min)
Budget 20000000
Revenue 100000
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Biography, Comedy, Drama
Director David Fincher
Writer Jack Fincher (screen play by)
Actors Gary Oldman, Amanda Seyfried, Lily Collins, Tom Pelphrey
Country USA
Awards Nominated for 10 Oscars. Another 41 wins & 238 nominations.
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix Mono
Aspect Ratio 2.20 : 1
Camera Red Ranger Helium Monochrome, Leitz SUMMILUX-C Lenses
Laboratory FotoKem Creative Services, Burbank (CA), USA (digital intermediate), PIX System, USA (digital dailies)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format Redcode RAW
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format), Redcode RAW (8K) (source format)
Printed Film Format D-Cinema, Video (UHD)

Mank 2020 123movies
Mank 2020 123movies
Mank 2020 123movies
Mank 2020 123movies
Mank 2020 123movies
Mank 2020 123movies
Mank 2020 123movies
Mank 2020 123movies
Mank 2020 123movies
Mank 2020 123movies
Original title Mank
TMDb Rating 7 696 votes

Similar titles

Woundings 1998 123movies
Fairfield Road 2010 123movies
Desperate Cowboys 2018 123movies
Pete Kelly’s Blues 1955 123movies
Mélo 1986 123movies
The Manchurian Candidate 1962 123movies
Sex and Death 101 2007 123movies
The Missing Gun 2002 123movies
The King and I 1999 123movies
The Haunting of Molly Bannister 2020 123movies
La La La at Rock Bottom 2015 123movies
Camila 1984 123movies
123Movies - Free Movies & TV Series Online